Dashboard

Host is the least enthusiastic about HBMX: it's the most expensive at 0.95%, and he says he 'wouldn't too much own this one' because the other two are cheaper and the big memory names are weighted more heavily there. Presented mainly as an educational contrast on how weighting changes performance.

Host likes DISK because it is cheaper (0.75%) and its top holdings, SNDK (17%) and SK Hynix (14%), are the 'big dogs' he favors. He groups it with DRAM as his preferred picks of the three.

Host is heavily bullish — he owns it, got in at $37, and calls the current ~$61 price (vs $81 high) 'truly a steal.' It's up 127% YTD and is the cheapest of the three at 0.65%, with the biggest memory names (Samsung, SK Hynix, MU, SNDK, STX) weighted heavily.

Core allocation recommendation: ~40% of portfolio in the NASDAQ. Notes it is ~7% overvalued currently but a long-term holding.

His core allocation recommendation: ~40% of portfolio in the S&P 500. He notes 95% of people don't beat the S&P, and it is his base holding despite being ~6% overvalued short-term. Recommends buying when below 125/200-day MA.

Noted as a 5.75% holding in HBMX doing AI compute, cloud infrastructure, and chip design for memory; host calls it 'good' but does not recommend buying it directly.

Described as a storage (not memory) company and one of the 'big dogs' performing outstandingly, contributing to DRAM's strong run; up triple digits per the host.

Held up as a strong performer (up triple digits) and a major weight in DISK (17%) and DRAM (8%); host is positive on its memory/AI pivot and its contribution to DRAM's surge.

Described as the second-largest memory company in the world and a core holding across all three ETFs; host notes its shares are up triple digits and is positive on its role in the AI memory ecosystem, though he does not give a standalone buy call.